Subscribe below to receive notification of the latest update.

Subscription options

Name:   

E-mail:  

ATS Newsletters

by author

Tarotpedia

The Boiardo 15th c Poem
Tarot history in brief

quotations from various people

Functions of Readings
What is Tarot?


Anonymous

Med. on XVIIII

Emily E. Auger

Tarot and Other Meditation Decks

L. Atkinson

Orphalese Software review

S. Arwen

Memory & Instinct

Kathy Berkowitz

Waite's Mystical Tradition (Pt 1)
Waite's Mystical Tradition (Pt 2)
Waite's Mystical Tradition (Pt 3)
Waite's Mystical Tradition (Pt 4)

Nina L. Braden

Tarot in Literature

David Brice

Birth of Tarot

Colin Browne

Square & Compasses Tarot

Lee A. Bursten

Journeys in Tarot Creation
Vachetta review

E.C.

Review: The Lo Scarabeo Story

Ross G. Caldwell

Tarot History

Bonnie Cehovet

Tarology - Poetics of Tarot
Review: Secret of Tarot
The Mystereum Tarot

N. Chishty-Mujahid

Concerning Ghisi’s Laberinto

Craig Conley

A House of Tarot Cards

A.B. Crowther

Rachel Pollack interview

Jean-Michel David

On Paneurythmy and Tarot
Tarot's expression of the numinous
Yarker, Tarot & Arcane Schools
Waite-Smith Sun card
The Fool as Wandering Jew
Tarot as Christian Art
Education through Tarot
Tarot: the vatical & the sacral
Fortuna, Ass & Monkey
Steiner and Tarot
1701 Dodal restored!
Enc. Tarot vol I-IV: review
Christ, World & Sin
Caveat Emptor:
       Visual Tarot

Tarot & AlefBeit
Review: Jean Payen Tarot
Tarot and Freemasonry
I-Ching and Pip Cards
Whither directing your course?
Tarot & the Tree of Life
Ovid, Egypt and Tarot
When the Devil isn't the Devil
Four elements and the suits
Court Cards & MBTI
Certification & Codes
Jean Dodal Marseille
Conference FAQs
Golden Dawn
Kabalah & Tarot
Golden Tarot review
Annual spread
Iraqi Museum
Two Brief TdM reviews
Meditations on the Tarot

Enrique Enriquez

The Joy of Wordplay
J-C. Flornoy interview
Embodied Tarot
Indirect Suggestions
Whispering to the Eye

Mark Filipas

History of Egyptian Decks
Lexicon Theory

Jean-Claude Flornoy

in memorium
from Oral Tradition

Roxanne Flornoy

Children and Tarot
from Oral Tradition

Mary Greer

Killing the Thoth Deck
On the Tarot of the Four Worlds
Egypt, Tarot and Mystery School Initiations

William Haigwood

The Sixties: Counterculture Tarot

Alissa Hall

Parlour Tricks

Kris Hadar

The Tarot

Claas Hoffmann

Crowley-Harris 'Thoth' deck

Michael J. Hurst

Tarot Symbolism review

K. Frank Jensen

Century with the Waite-Smith

Shane Kendal

A Poetry of Tarot

Ken J. Killeen

The Metaphysical Bible

Barbara Klaser

Language of Tarot

E. Koretaka

Cardinal Virtues

Dovid Krafchow

Kabbalistic Tarot

Lisa Larson

Perceptions of Spirituality

Suzan E. Lemont

Therapeutic Tarot Work

Eric K. Lerner

Diloggun and Tarot

N. Levine

Tarot of Prague review

C. Liknaitzky

Journey in Ceramics

Joep van Loon

Tarot Wheel

Karen Mahony

Prague

S.J. Mangan

Fool, Alef & Orion

Robert Mealing

Petrarch’s Triumphs
Jean Noblet Tarot
Hunting the "true" Marseille Tarot
Cary Sheet

Fern Mercier

Playing the Fool

C. de Mellet

Inquiries into Tarot

Sophie Nusslé

Fantastic Menagerie

Robert V. O'Neill

Tarot Symbolism
Tower Iconology

Michael Owen

Xultun Tarot

Dan Pelletier

Magic Manga Tarot
the Blank Spot

Robert M. Place

The Fool's Journey

Debra Rosenthal

Looking at the Jacques Vieville

Mjr Tom Schick

Tarot Lovers Calendar

Inna Semetsky

Counseling Reading for Spouses
Learning the language of images
Re-Symbolization of Self
Tarot (dis)contents

Diana Sobolewska

'Bateleur's tale'

Russell Sturgess

Jesus's New Testament

N. Swift

Sufism & Tarot

Arthur E. Waite

Symbols of Tarot

Christ, the World and Sin


Jean-Michel David
www.fourhares.com

Unless living in continental Europe and knowing what to look for and where, it is only since the nineteen-eighties that images from older decks became easily accessible with Kaplan’s first volume of his now four volume (and I hear soon-ish to be five) Encyclopedia of Tarot. Even with the first two volumes available by 1990, historically oriented decks were themselves scarce. It’s only with the advent of the internet that the last ten years has made a reasonably large number of early images readily available for those of us in search – yet without the proper research means – of early models and what these may possibly have meant or intended. This does not of course mean that many books were not also earlier available: to be sure, they were, and provided much to whet the mind’s imaginative faculty.

 

Grimaud Marseille Tarot World card   Conver Marseille Tarot World card

Grimaud (c. 1930)

 

Conver (c. 1760)

Christ tympanum

‘simplified’ though typical tympanum showing Christ and four evangelists

 

It’s in this context that what has always been apparent (at least to me) is twofold: on the one hand the obviousness of the Christian basis and Christian content of the imagery of the trumps; and on the other that decks to which I had access to simply seemed to be ‘missing’ the one image that it seems ‘ought’ to be there in this context, namely that of Christ. It seemed of course obvious that the Grimaud Marseille, and the 1760 Conver on which it is based, bore direct iconographic similarities to the ubiquitous cathedral tympanum carvings showing Christ amongst the four evangelists. The obvious and ‘problematic’ connection being, of course, Christ’s and the World card’s contrasting depicted gender: whereas Christ is obviously masculine, the World, in those cards, is unquestionably depicted with feminine attributes.

This does not negate in any manner the way in which tarot has also, especially since the development of the neo-Pagan revivalism of the 1980s, been appropriated and modified to reflect numerous world-views: from those that suggest more jungian concepts to others that incorporate Buddhist, Australian Dreamtime, Native American, Aztec, Wiccan, or indeed harken to ancient and modern myths and sagas from those of Ancient Egypt or Greece to the Kalevala and modern literary giants such as Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings. All these, of course, irrespective as to what I personally consider the merit or otherwise of any specific examplar, and omitting another huge range of decks that are essentially artistic templates or ‘frames’ (from Dali to the hundreds of perhaps lesser known, but in some cases incredibly talented artists).

Having before us a deck such as the Grimaud that reflected in so many ways the central trunk of tarot’s diversity, and finding that this deck was essentially unmodified since the 1760s, the type of deck was very fast, for myself at any rate, the core upon which an understanding of tarot as a whole needed to be mapped to or, perhaps by better analogy, anchored. Even more so when it is realised that most twentieth century tarot themselves derive in large part via the works of either Wirth, Waite, Crowley, Falconnier, or Etteilla, and that each and all of those are based, at least for their trumps, on first and foremost the Marseille-style.

It is also apparent, however, that as we look back into history, the earliest of known decks differ from the Marseille-type. Of most obvious differing form are the Visconti-type decks, individually hand-painted and gilded in the 15th century. Also, differences arise in what appears to be a number of possible orderings (not only were the earliest decks un-titled and un-numbered, but when numbering did start to make an appearance, variations occurs, with, for example, the Hermit numbered XI). In terms of imagery, the Visconti-Sforza, Cary-Yale, anonymous Parisian (due to the publishing house’s name having been carved out of the woodblock prior to the imprint that has survived), and Vieville, each pre-1700 decks yet the second pair dating two centuries later than the first, display significant enough differences:

Visconti-Sforza Tarot World card   Cary-Yale Visconti Tarot World card

Visconti-Sforza (c. 1450)

 

Cary-Yale Visconti (c. 1450)

anomynous Parisian Tarot World card   Vieville Tarot World card

anomynous Parisian (c. 1650)

 

Vieville (c. 1650)

 

Each of those decks include elements that have important symbolic references, many of which slowly being re-discovered by the tarot community. In the decks above, for example, the Visconti-Sforza may display, as suggested by both Moakley and more recently by Berti and Gonard, the Heavenly Jerusalem; in contrast the Cary-Yale and the Parisian seem to suggest Fate or Fortune over the fate of lands and the Earth. In the Vieville, we find the closest overall iconographic image to the Marseille-type earlier shown. Yet this quite late depiction is not the sole of the period or earlier as both the card found in one of the Sforza castlelets and the Noblet bear important resemblances:

 

Sforza Castle well Tarot World card   Noblet Marseille Tarot World card

Sforza Castle well card (c. 1500)

 

Noblet (c. 1650)

 

The Heavenly Jerusalem of the Visconti-Sforza is, to be sure, conceptually very closely related to the Vieville in that this city is deemed as the heavenly abode of the eternal Christ as presented in especially mediæval and renaissance Christianity. That he appears more ambiguously feminine in the Noblet does not diminish the intent as Christ. Apart from any other considerations, numerous mystical works exist that speak of Christ in feminine terms and, specifically, with reference to his bosom suckling his children – ie, us.

Amongst a couple of other examples I also include in my Reading the Marseille Tarot is a quote from Lia Moran and Jacob Gilad’s ‘From Folklore to Scientific Evidence’ [International Journal of Biomedical Science Dec. 2007], who remind us that:

Contrary to modern days, Jesus Christ has been often portrayed as having feminine qualities in medieval times. This includes both having physical feminine attributes such as lactating breasts as well as religious ones, such as Christ lactating his believers, reversing the role of Mary and Christ-child to Mother Jesus and the child-like soul. Others have connected the wound in Jesus’ side and breasts full of soul-sustaining milk or used breast milk symbolism to illustrate ideas of the motherhood of Christ versus the fatherhood of God.

That there is a ‘natural’ transformation of a figure that earlier clearly represented Christ surrounded by the four evangelists to that same figure as (initially) ambiguously feminine and over time ever less so makes sense in this context – as long as the concept of Christ with feminine attributes remains something that is alive to the mystical life of the community. Once this aspect is lost, so too does the figure’s original reference become somewhat forgotten and eventually transformed to something else that can be meaningfully re-considered. In our case, a figure that increasingly becomes simultaneously removed and present as tentative steps are taken to gain anew what a ‘Spiritu Mundi’ may mean.

In a sequence of cards that clearly bears a Renaissance Christian worldview – albeit one infused with neo-platonic and neo-aristotelean elements – it ‘makes sense’ to have its highest figure alive in the realm of the spirit yet at once both reachable and ineffable. The perfected Man, the second Adam, into which not only as breath been breathed (the ‘A’–air into the blood formed out of earth–DaM), but also, for the Christian, the Fires of Life (Shin) descended within humanity, and at once also showing a metamorphosis of Yahweh to Jeheshuah.

Allow me a little to explain the above.

Let’s first take a couple of steps back.

If the Hebrew alphabet has had any organising influence of the ordering of the trumps (and also have a small impact on minor details), then it is unlikely to have been in the order that was imposed on the cards by late 19th century views – though these in turn have of course had an impact on how decks that adopt views from the derivative orders of the three main ‘traditions’ will include details to match the preference.

In my personal view, I still consider it highly likely that some simple influence assisted in getting the trump sequence and its iconography stabilised between its creation around the first half of the 15th century and the time it became ‘canonised’ by what we now call the Marseille-type in the mid-17th century. Something like an ordered alphabetic sequence, due to its simplicity, certainly has appeal. This in itself does not make it correct, of course. What is interesting is that the letters’ ordinal values reflect well the Marseille-type’s numbered trumps, with the un-numbered Fool placed where only he can be: last, yet wherever he pleases.

If this sequence has any meaning, then each and every card, without much effort, would need to in some extent or other reflect an alphabetic consideration. Some more ‘obvious’ visual ones are Alef and the Bateleur, Lamed and the Pendu, Ayin and the Tower, Tzaddhi and the Moon, Kof and the Sun; some become ‘as obvious’ with a little reflection on the similarity of meanings of the letter-as-word or its import, such as Beit and the Papess, Samek and the Devil, and Resh and Judgement.

With Shin (or Sin – excuse the pun that only works in English and could not resist in the title of this piece), what we have is the twenty-first letter, so some aspect to its relation to Christ needs to be found if the methodology is to yield feasible or plausible results. Fortunately, this is one of the easiest upon which to reflect as long as some of the common practices of the times is known.

Yahweh, or the unpronounced name of God in the Torah, is written with four letters: YHVH, and these are themselves found commonly enough in especially high places enclosed within a triangle in numerous Cathedrals – though at times it is obvious that the carver knew no Hebrew but was instead merely copying script he or she was not able to ‘read’:

 

Yod Heh Vav Heh

YHVH rendered in typically poor Hebrewl

 

One of the views that gained some prominence (and a means used in attempts to convert Jews – when more brutal means were not at play), was to claim that God the Father becomes God the Son in the ‘insertion’ of the Holy Spirit (who has tongues of flame, as does Shin) within the tetragrammaton (tetra means four in Greek, hence ‘4-lettered name’). In other words, YHVHYHShVH Yahweh is Yeheshuah (Jesus).

 

YHShVH (as read from right to left)

 

In the context of the card image, this can be brought to reflection as the central figure is seen to be embedded within the four living creatures said to be at the Throne of God.

Within the religious context and mysticism of the times, the image, its placement, and even its possible Hebrew letter become understandable, and a redemption of the World in its eternal call towards Holy Jerusalem something that, for the person wishing to reflect on the imagery as religious art, a feasible reflection.

Of course, these reflections do not mean that the trumps necessarily developed in quite the way here mentioned…

Similarly, that the central image has come to be first and foremost feminised beyond its likely earlier pointing to Christ reflects the mores of the times that change with the spiritual strivings within cultural shifts. Nonetheless and in my personal view, the grounding of the image needs to also be recognised.

5 comments to

Christ, the World and Sin

  • C

    Good Evening Jean-Michel…

    …maybe you shouldnt narrow down your sight on conventional christian belief when you want to find out what TAROT is about – it was the time of RENAISSANCE when the Cards sprang to Life…

    The picture on the TdM World Card is several hundred years older than that – you might have a look on the Greco-Roman bas relief 2nd C. A.D.in the Modena Museum of PHANES and the even much elder Pelasgian creation myth about Eurynome and Ophion what should have become later the model for the Orphic beliefs…

    Enjoy

    C

  • jmd

    Thank you C.,

    I am aware of the image to which you refer, having previously also used it in various courses since the 1980s and discussed it online.

    The main point with it is that similarity is not identity. In other words, just because an image has various aspects that has similarity to another does not make of one the antecedent to the other, nor even influential thereon. If that is what is suggested, then it needs to be argued.

  • C

    Good Morning Jean-Michel…

    …you are very right – in this case things are much more complicated than that – sometimes it can be just the other way round – meaning a chronological young event might be evidentially “older” than its “antecedent” !

    When in nature such an event occurs it is called an “atavism”.

    Im referring to the TdM of Grimaud – I liked your attitude towards this deck in the above text very much – and ( maybe not exactly ) like you – I think of it as the bearer of the essence of Tarot – naturally only as a “descendant” of the elder Visconti-Sforza Cards…

    As you said – the G. TdM is based on the C. TdM – nevertheless it features many often overlooked iconographic details – and some of them are NOT present in the preserved Conver Cards.
    Now – knowing from his wood printing devices that Conver did several versions of similar cards – for several reasons – it might be assumed that the G. TdM might be the more “original” Tarot.
    Of course this would only make sense if those details take the cards to a “new” level – and thats what they do.

    But to see that one has to leave the “oracle” point of view – looking at only ONE card at a time – behind.

    Some of these details are – the 2 dices on the Magicians table showing 1 and 5 – the rivets on the cuirass of the Charioteer – the square in the middle of 4 of discs and whats in it…

    Further more you might place XI directly under XXI – and see what happens…
    …and you might be surprised when you try first – from left to right – XVII – XVI – XX…
    …and then move the XX to the right – so that another card will fit between XVI and XX – and try XIII…

    All the above is not to be understood in the context of conventional “card reading”…

    If you are interested in the iconographic roots of the Visconti-Sforza Cards – from which – especially the Grimaud TdM is a direct offspring – and have a little time at hand – you might be interested in reading this…

    http://www.tarotforum.net/showthread.php?t=128423

    Have a good weekend

    C

  • C

    Good Day Jean-Michel…

    …now – you are so seemingly occupied with your various courses and discussing important things online – that I can understand how the above has left you utterly speechless…

    Who wouldnt be ?

    …I thought of offering you a glimpse on – for this purpose “Courier New” works well – how the “landscape-sequence” occurs between the cards quite naturally – if you know what the Numerals are made for – to cheer you up a little bit in the meantime – nevertheless…

    A
    ————( )————
    ( )—-(18)—-(19)—-( )
    —-(15)—-(17)—-(20)—-
    ——–(14)—-(16)——–
    —-(13)————( )—-
    ——–( )—-( )——–
    —-( )—-( )—-( )—-
    ( )—-( )—-( )—-( )
    ————( )————

    B
    ————( )————
    ( )—-(18)—-(19)—-( )
    —-(15)—-(17)(16)(20)—-
    ——–(14)—————-
    —-(13)————( )—-
    ——–( )—-( )——–
    —-( )—-( )—-( )—-
    ( )—-( )—-( )—-( )
    ————( )————

    C
    ————( )————
    ( )—-(18)—-(19)—-( )
    —-(15)—-(17)(16)(20)—-
    ——–(14)—-(13)——–
    ——————–( )—-
    ——–( )—-( )——–
    —-( )—-( )—-( )—-
    ( )—-( )—-( )—-( )
    ————( )————

    D
    ————( )————
    ( )—-(18)—-(19)—-( )
    —-(15)—-(17)(16)(20)—-
    —————-(13)——–
    —-(14)————( )—-
    ——–( )—-( )——–
    —-( )—-( )—-( )—-
    ( )—-( )—-( )—-( )
    ————( )————

    E
    ————( )————
    ( )—-(18)—-(19)—-( )
    —-(15)(17)—-(16)(20)—-
    —————-(13)——–
    —-(14)————( )—-
    ——–( )—-( )——–
    —-( )—-( )—-( )—-
    ( )—-( )—-( )—-( )
    ————( )————

    F
    ————( )————
    ( )—-(18)—-(19)—-( )
    —-(15)(17)(16)—-(20)—-
    —————-(13)——–
    —-(14)————( )—-
    ——–( )—-( )——–
    —-( )—-( )—-( )—-
    ( )—-( )—-( )—-( )
    ————( )————

    G
    ————( )————
    ( )—-(18)—-(19)—-( )
    —-(15)(17)(16)(13)(20)—-
    —————————-
    —-(14)————( )—-
    ——–( )—-( )——–
    —-( )—-( )—-( )—-
    ( )—-( )—-( )—-( )
    ————( )————

    …it may be difficult – hopefully not impossible – to fill a cup that THINKS it is already full – so I did it step by step not to confuse y 🙂 u…

    And now – if you may – think about the little holes – some worn out and replaced – for example – in the Visconti-Sforza Cards – AND the background pattern on 19 of the 20 preserved Trumps – AND about the MEASUREMENTS of the Cards…

    NOW – at least – you can tell the FAKED Sets from the REAL ones – IF you want to…

    DEO VOLENTE

    C

  • […] about when that image (the woman inside the wreath) first appeared.  There is an article as tarotstudies.org, which reviews this issue and gives an example of the Marseille image from around 1500 as a Sforza […]

You must be logged in to post a comment.